Technology

Doverunner App Security Overview: Pricing For Mobile Security

For any company that uses mobile apps to interact with clients, make payments, and gather information, app security constitutes one of the most significant factors. Selecting the appropriate security provider becomes crucial as mobile app attacks grow more common. Given this, Doverunner distinguishes itself in the competitive app security market by providing a distinctive price structure that is flexible and represents value for companies of all sizes. The doverunner app security pricing is unique in the industry for the following seven reasons.

DoveRunner Multi-DRM Pricing Plans Comparison:

Plan NamePriceIncluded Users (MAU)Features IncludedExcess User Pricing (per MAU)Our Take
Free Trial$01,000 MAL / 50 MAU (30 days)– All Professional plan features
– DRM license service trial
– Full access to client SDK
Not applicableGood for testing, but limited to small usage and short duration. Ideal only to get the feel.
Standard Plan$299/mo1,000 MAU– Everything in Free Trial
– Multi-DRM (PlayReady, Widevine, FairPlay)
– HTML5 player support via MSE/EME
– CLI Packager or 3rd-party integration
– CPIX/SPEKE Key exchange
– Native DRM API support
– Web dashboard
– Post-paid billing
– No setup/AMC/tech support charges
– 1,001–10,000: $0.0600
– 10,001–100,000: $0.0400
– 100,001–1M: $0.0250
– 1M–3M: $0.0050
– 3M+: $0.0015
Strong core DRM package, but lacks SDKs for mobile/OTT apps. Better for web and simple workflows.
Professional Plan$499/mo1,000 MAU– Everything in Standard
– SDKs for Android, iOS, tvOS, UWP
– DRM licensing for NCG
– NCG SDK for Windows/macOS
– Extended device support
– 1,001–10,000: $0.0900
– 10,001–100,000: $0.0600
– 100,001–1M: $0.0375
– 1M–3M: $0.0075
– 3M+: $0.0023
Fully loaded for enterprise-grade deployment. But post-1K MAU costs jump sharply.

What Stands Out — And What’s Missing

Now stepping back — here’s the real-world view from a product usage lens.

  • Free Trial:
    It’s decent, generous even, but not production-grade. You’ll hit the cap quick if you’re testing OTT or app-wide functionality. It’s clearly meant to show off the bells and whistles of the Professional plan — no complaints here, just manage expectations.
  • Standard Plan:
    This is the workhorse plan. It gives you real DRM muscle with full integration options across key platforms (PlayReady, Widevine, FairPlay). It’s great if your product is web-first or already has a packager setup.
    But: There’s no SDK support here. That’s a dealbreaker for mobile apps or hybrid environments. Also, while the excess MAU pricing is fair at scale, there’s no volume bundling or elasticity built-in.
  • Professional Plan:
    This is clearly designed for media houses, OTT platforms, or serious SaaS distribution — SDKs for every major platform, support for offline content (NCG), and extended device compatibility.
    The only red flag? Post-1K MAU costs spike fast. That $0.09/user pricing at lower scale hurts startups or mid-tier players growing fast. It rewards mega scale (over 1M users), but getting there might be financially tight.

DoveRunner’s pricing structure is clean, transparent, and tiered sensibly — but it assumes your product is either testing, mature web-first, or enterprise-level SDK-ready. There’s no middle ground. If you’re a mobile-first product in early growth phase (say 5K–50K MAUs), you’re almost forced into the Professional tier — and that could mean overpaying early on just to get SDK access.

A smarter play for them would be to introduce a Mid-Scale SDK Plan or bundle the SDK support at a more progressive excess cost under the Standard plan. Still, for large publishers and SaaS-scale businesses, the Professional plan is rock solid. It does what it says — and at high volumes, it becomes cost-efficient again.

Forensic Watermarking Pricing Breakdown

PlanPriceSession LimitIncluded FeaturesExcess ChargesOur Take
Free Trial$01,000 sessions + 2 detections– 30-day free trial
– Access to console, FFMPEG plugin, Preprocessor SDK
– Sample token code
– Akamai & CloudFront support
– Watermarked video with “Demo” text
Not applicableDecent test bed. No real production usage here, just a sandbox with branding limits.
Standard Plan$500/mo20,000 sessions/month– All Free Trial features
– Preprocessing flexibility
– 1 detection per file
– T&P watermarking (minimal coding)
– Dashboard + tech support
$50/mo per additional 10K sessionsPricey entry, but good support for small teams. Detection limit is restrictive.
Professional Plan$2,000/mo2,000,000 sessions/month– All Standard features
– Fastly integration
– Up to 2 detection requests per file monthly
$500/mo per additional 500K sessionsScales well, but detection cap (2 per file) is still tight for large-scale piracy tracking.

Forensic Watermarking: What’s Fair, What’s Not

  • Trial Mode gives a taste of the system — including tools like FFMPEG and token APIs. But the “Demo” text means you’re not ready for distribution yet. It’s perfect for backend validation, not rollout.
  • Standard Plan is honestly well-priced for startups, but there’s a catch — just one detection per file? That’s harsh. If you suspect leaks or need ongoing audits, you’re paying for detection every time. That can explode your budget fast.
  • Professional Plan handles scale, supports more CDNs (hello Fastly), and offers higher limits. But again, only two detection requests per file? At $2K/month, that cap feels stingy.

Distributor Watermarking Pricing Breakdown

PlanPriceRecipients LimitWatermarked Video OutputDetection SupportExcess / Add-OnsOur Take
Free Trial$01,000 recipientsMax 2,000 minutesMax 2 detection requestsCLI tool only, Demo watermarkGreat for trying CLI. Not useful in production — hard limits on minutes and branding.
Standard Plan$499/mo1,000 recipientsUp to 5,000 minutes$199 per detection$500 per additional 1,000 recipients
Video output: $0.9 → $0.3/min based on usage volume
Solid CLI support, but per-minute pricing adds up fast. Detection costs feel steep.
Professional Plan$999/mo2,000 recipientsUp to 5,000 minutes1 free detection/month$500 per additional 1,000 recipients
Video output: $0.8 → $0.1/min based on usage volume
Better pricing slope than Standard. Still, 5K minute cap could limit OTT or full-length use.
  • The Free Plan is more of a trial run for CLI fans. The 2,000-minute output sounds generous until you realize that’s roughly 33 hours of content — not even a week’s work for a small studio.
  • Standard Plan pricing builds fast. The $199/detection rate feels extreme — and those per-minute watermark charges can creep up before you know it. Hit 3,000+ minutes and suddenly you’re spending big. Good for small businesses if you’re frugal with detection use.
  • Professional Plan smooths the edges with better minute pricing (as low as $0.10/min), 2,000-recipient coverage, and one included detection. But the 5,000-minute cap still holds you back. Want to watermark your entire content catalog? You’ll need serious add-ons.

Conclusion

The goal of doverunner app security pricing is to provide premium solutions without the exorbitant prices that many of its rivals charge. It is a desirable choice for companies of all sizes due to its competitive, flexible, and transparent pricing. Doverrunner offers choices that might satisfy your particular needs, whether you’re searching for a pay-as-you-go strategy, scalable solutions, or customised security measures. The value proposition for companies looking for dependable and effective app security is further improved by the robust customer assistance that is included in the cost. Doverrunner is a good option if you’re searching for a reputable app security company that provides high-quality, scalable, and reasonably priced-services. It’s a solution that can expand with your company and help guarantee that your mobile apps stay safe in an increasingly complicated digital environment thanks to its all-encompassing approach to app security and affordable price structure.

About author

Articles

I'm excited to join the team and share my knowledge with you. I write informative articles on various topics, and I'm dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy content. I'm committed to verifying information and ensuring that every article is accurate and reliable. You can trust that my content is thoroughly researched and fact-checked. My expertise in research and fact-checking means that my articles are informative, engaging, and trustworthy. I'm here to provide you with high-quality content, and I look forward to sharing my work with you!
Related posts
Technology

Autonomy vs. Control: Rethinking Agentic AI Guardrails in Real-Time Support

A support AI that can’t act is useless. An AI that acts without limits is dangerous. The real…
Read more
Technology

Susbluezilla: The Quest for Smooth Tech

Susbluezilla kicked off back in 2019, a tech project with a big dream: to make every device run so…
Read more
EntertainmentTechnology

Gaseping Com: A Handmade Find from 1844

Back in 1844, there was this guy named Thomas Harrow living in a quiet little village. He had a…
Read more

4 Comments

Comments are closed.
  • blank
  • blank
  • blank
  • blank